• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
Science

Human brain tissue reportedly connects with mouse nervous systems

NPR reports that mice with human brain cells offer a way to study conditions such as cerebral palsy, while ethicists question whether this changes how the animals should be treated.

Not In Your FeedNI
Ken RutkowskiKR
2 Sources, 23d ago, first seen 23d ago

TLDR

Lab-grown human brain tissue connected with the nervous systems of mice engineered to lack most of their cerebral cortex and hippocampus, according to a post describing a Stanford study. The account says mice with grafts performed above chance on a Y-shaped maze test associated with working memory, while mice without grafts did not. It cautions that this does not establish that memories were stored in the human cells. NPR describes the mice as a disease-research tool and reports ethical questions about whether their treatment should change.

Combined views

4.4K

2 Sources, first seen 23d ago

3 likes1 comments1 reposts

Combined views

4.4K

2 Sources, first seen 23d ago

3 likes1 comments1 reposts

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

Not In Your Feed@NotInYourFeedWhat if a mouse looked up at you one day and said, “I want out”? Sounds like science fiction. But human brain tissue grown from stem cells is already working inside mice. A new Stanford study even found clues involving working memory. How far could that go? In a study published in Nature on September 16, researchers transplanted lab-grown human brain tissue into mice engineered to develop without most of their cerebral cortex and hippocampus. The tissue kept growing. It connected with the mice’s nervous systems. Some of its nerve fibers reached all the way to the spinal cord. Keeping transplanted cells alive is one thing. Having them become part of a working nervous system is another. When researchers exposed these mice to low oxygen, the human tissue was damaged. The mice then developed problems with walking and balance. Ordinary mice, and mice with the same missing brain regions but no human graft, showed little effect under the same conditions. That suggests the human tissue had become involved in how the animals’ nervous systems worked. It wasn’t just sitting there. Then there was the memory test. Researchers used a Y-shaped maze to assess a behavior associated with working memory—the ability to briefly hold information and use it. The mice with human grafts performed above chance. The mice without grafts did not. That doesn’t establish that memories were stored in the human cells. But it does raise the possibility that the tissue was contributing to a memory-related function. And this isn’t the first sign that lab-grown human neurons can become part of an animal’s behavior. In a separate study published in 2022, human brain tissue transplanted into rats received sensory input. After training, stimulating those human neurons could prompt the rats to seek a water reward. Which brings us to a much bigger question than how many human cells are inside a mouse’s head: If this tissue can participate in sensation, behavior and possibly some memory-related processes, what happens as it matures, forms new connections and becomes part of a nervous system that keeps learning? Could it change what the animal is capable of learning? Given the same training, could an animal with human neural tissue become better at connecting sounds or symbols with objects? Could it take a relationship it had learned and apply it to a situation it had never encountered before? Could any of that eventually support some aspect of language comprehension? Those aren’t findings from the current study. They’re questions we can ask because of what the experiments have already shown. And when we imagine an animal “speaking human,” the most important part isn’t whether it can make a human-sounding noise. It’s whether it can understand meaning, combine ideas and communicate something it actually wants to say. A future experiment wouldn’t have to start by teaching a mouse to talk. It could investigate whether the animal can select symbols or use a device to communicate something beyond a simple conditioned response. Of course, pressing the right button doesn’t mean an animal understands language. The hard part would be figuring out what it understands—and whether it can use that understanding in a new context. Nothing in these studies shows that mice can acquire human language. Nor do they show that growing more human brain tissue will automatically produce human thought. Human cells don’t come with vocabulary and grammar preinstalled. But finding a role in movement, or a possible role in memory, doesn’t establish that those are the only functions the tissue could ever support. That’s the part I keep coming back to. Scientists have shown that human neural tissue can form functional connections inside another species’ brain. I want to know more than how large those grafts can grow. I want to know whether they could change what an animal is able to understand. There’s a huge distance between joining a neural circuit, understanding a symbol and using language. None of those steps automatically leads to the next. Still, we can break the idea of a “talking animal” into specific questions: What could it learn? What could it communicate? How would we tell the difference between understanding and a trained response? The experiments haven’t answered those questions. They have given us a reason to investigate the limits rather than assume we already know them. And if an animal in a cage could ever tell us, in words we understood, what it wanted? Its brain wouldn’t be the only thing that had changed. Our relationship with animals would change, too. Sources: The new Nature study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11032-2 Stanford Medicine’s explanation: https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2026/09/model-to-study-brain-development.html The 2022 study in rats: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05277-w23d
Ken Rutkowski@kenradioThe headline is only the start. The useful part is the evidence behind it: Health: Mice with human brain cells offer a tool to study disease. Ethicists ask: What's next? https://www.npr.org/2026/09/16/nx-s1-5968873/lab-mouse-human-brain-cells-organoid-disease-ethics23d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    Stanford

    2 Sources

    Not In Your Feed@NotInYourFeedWhat if a mouse looked up at you one day and said, “I want out”? Sounds like science fiction. But human brain tissue grown from stem cells is already working inside mice. A new Stanford study even found clues involving working memory. How far could that go? In a study published in Nature on September 16, researchers transplanted lab-grown human brain tissue into mice engineered to develop without most of their cerebral cortex and hippocampus. The tissue kept growing. It connected with the mice’s nervous systems. Some of its nerve fibers reached all the way to the spinal cord. Keeping transplanted cells alive is one thing. Having them become part of a working nervous system is another. When researchers exposed these mice to low oxygen, the human tissue was damaged. The mice then developed problems with walking and balance. Ordinary mice, and mice with the same missing brain regions but no human graft, showed little effect under the same conditions. That suggests the human tissue had become involved in how the animals’ nervous systems worked. It wasn’t just sitting there. Then there was the memory test. Researchers used a Y-shaped maze to assess a behavior associated with working memory—the ability to briefly hold information and use it. The mice with human grafts performed above chance. The mice without grafts did not. That doesn’t establish that memories were stored in the human cells. But it does raise the possibility that the tissue was contributing to a memory-related function. And this isn’t the first sign that lab-grown human neurons can become part of an animal’s behavior. In a separate study published in 2022, human brain tissue transplanted into rats received sensory input. After training, stimulating those human neurons could prompt the rats to seek a water reward. Which brings us to a much bigger question than how many human cells are inside a mouse’s head: If this tissue can participate in sensation, behavior and possibly some memory-related processes, what happens as it matures, forms new connections and becomes part of a nervous system that keeps learning? Could it change what the animal is capable of learning? Given the same training, could an animal with human neural tissue become better at connecting sounds or symbols with objects? Could it take a relationship it had learned and apply it to a situation it had never encountered before? Could any of that eventually support some aspect of language comprehension? Those aren’t findings from the current study. They’re questions we can ask because of what the experiments have already shown. And when we imagine an animal “speaking human,” the most important part isn’t whether it can make a human-sounding noise. It’s whether it can understand meaning, combine ideas and communicate something it actually wants to say. A future experiment wouldn’t have to start by teaching a mouse to talk. It could investigate whether the animal can select symbols or use a device to communicate something beyond a simple conditioned response. Of course, pressing the right button doesn’t mean an animal understands language. The hard part would be figuring out what it understands—and whether it can use that understanding in a new context. Nothing in these studies shows that mice can acquire human language. Nor do they show that growing more human brain tissue will automatically produce human thought. Human cells don’t come with vocabulary and grammar preinstalled. But finding a role in movement, or a possible role in memory, doesn’t establish that those are the only functions the tissue could ever support. That’s the part I keep coming back to. Scientists have shown that human neural tissue can form functional connections inside another species’ brain. I want to know more than how large those grafts can grow. I want to know whether they could change what an animal is able to understand. There’s a huge distance between joining a neural circuit, understanding a symbol and using language. None of those steps automatically leads to the next. Still, we can break the idea of a “talking animal” into specific questions: What could it learn? What could it communicate? How would we tell the difference between understanding and a trained response? The experiments haven’t answered those questions. They have given us a reason to investigate the limits rather than assume we already know them. And if an animal in a cage could ever tell us, in words we understood, what it wanted? Its brain wouldn’t be the only thing that had changed. Our relationship with animals would change, too. Sources: The new Nature study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-11032-2 Stanford Medicine’s explanation: https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2026/09/model-to-study-brain-development.html The 2022 study in rats: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05277-w23d
    Ken Rutkowski@kenradioThe headline is only the start. The useful part is the evidence behind it: Health: Mice with human brain cells offer a tool to study disease. Ethicists ask: What's next? https://www.npr.org/2026/09/16/nx-s1-5968873/lab-mouse-human-brain-cells-organoid-disease-ethics23d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet