• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Reaction

A claimed ChatGPT research overlap draws criticism

Posts cite a paper excerpt alleging an OpenAI result matched a draft uploaded to ChatGPT weeks earlier.

Susan ZhangSZ
Kevin Patrick MurphyKP
Naomi SaphraNS
7 Sources, 2d ago, first seen 2d ago

TLDR

An October 8 post quotes a paper excerpt claiming that an OpenAI result released October 6 was identical to a preliminary draft uploaded to ChatGPT on September 8. Susan Zhang sarcastically framed the episode as “continuous learning,” while Kevin Murphy raised a hypothetical question about whether cross-user context sharing could be treated differently from conventional model training. The posts do not establish how OpenAI produced the result.

Combined views

47.4K

7 Sources, first seen 2d ago

829 likes20 comments151 saves289 reposts

Combined views

47.4K

7 Sources, first seen 2d ago

829 likes20 comments151 saves289 reposts

An October 8 X post quotes a paper excerpt claiming that an OpenAI result labeled #311 and released October 6 was identical to a preliminary version of the paper uploaded to ChatGPT on September 8. The post characterized the timeline as the author being “scooped by Chat.”

Featured Source

The excerpt alone does not show how OpenAI produced the result, whether the uploaded draft influenced it or whether any policy was violated.

In a separate reaction, Susan Zhang sarcastically called the episode “continuous learning” rather than scooping or intellectual fraud, then joked about an “intelligence explosion.”

Kevin Murphy posed a hypothetical about whether sharing chat content across users through system context could be treated differently from conventional model training, and asked what the terms of service allow. His post does not establish that such sharing occurred.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Related

Codex adds beta next-message suggestions for Pro users

OpenAI says the feature uses your conversation and how you talk to Codex to suggest what to say next.

OpenAI Rolls Out "Ultrafast" Mode for GPT-6.1 Sol

OpenAI says the mode offers up to 8x faster speeds than Sol Standard in the API, Codex, and ChatGPT Work.

OpenAI Rolls Out "Ultrafast" Mode for GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI’s $50B versus $70B revenue debate and AI infrastructure demand

One post questions how much revenue OpenAI keeps after partners take a cut and argues token growth matters more.

7 Sources

doomslide@doomslideCheck out this loser! >uploads a draft to Chat on Sept. 8th >gets scooped by Chat on Oct. 6th "The result released by OpenAI (#311) on October 6, 2026... identical to a preliminary version of the present paper that was uploaded to ChatGPT on September 8, 2026" LMAO get rekt2d
Susan Zhang@suchenzangit's not scooping, nor intellectual fraud, it's "continuous learning" ! rejoice in the era of intelligence explosion, my dears.2d
JFPuget 🇫🇷🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱@JFPugetAnother evidence of OpenAI publishing results close to unpublished material from mathematicians who used OpenAI LLMs and app. After training on copyrighted published material are they training on unpublished material? What a bad time to be a mathematician. Should be the opposite.2d
Georgia Chalvatzaki@GeorgiaChalRT @JFPuget: Another evidence of OpenAI publishing results close to unpublished material from mathematicians who used OpenAI LLMs and app.…1d
Kevin Patrick Murphy@sirbayesObviously everyone should disable "your chats are used for model training", but what if the OAI and Ant engineers told the lawyercats that ICL is not "training", so sharing chat across users via system context is allowed as long as it doesnt get fed to SGD? What does TOS say?1d
Dr Heidy Khlaaf (هايدي خلاف)@HeidyKhlaafThis along with the recent paper claiming that OAI's formalised Lean proof doesn't correspond to the NL proof of Navier-Stokes, is exactly why we shouldn't take AI labs' claims at face value without scientific consensus and investigations into alleged plagiarism.1d
Naomi Saphra@nsaphraRT @doomslide: Check out this loser! >uploads a draft to Chat on Sept. 8th >gets scooped by Chat on Oct. 6th "The result released by Open…1d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    OpenAI

    7 Sources

    doomslide@doomslideCheck out this loser! >uploads a draft to Chat on Sept. 8th >gets scooped by Chat on Oct. 6th "The result released by OpenAI (#311) on October 6, 2026... identical to a preliminary version of the present paper that was uploaded to ChatGPT on September 8, 2026" LMAO get rekt2d
    Susan Zhang@suchenzangit's not scooping, nor intellectual fraud, it's "continuous learning" ! rejoice in the era of intelligence explosion, my dears.2d
    JFPuget 🇫🇷🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱@JFPugetAnother evidence of OpenAI publishing results close to unpublished material from mathematicians who used OpenAI LLMs and app. After training on copyrighted published material are they training on unpublished material? What a bad time to be a mathematician. Should be the opposite.2d
    Georgia Chalvatzaki@GeorgiaChalRT @JFPuget: Another evidence of OpenAI publishing results close to unpublished material from mathematicians who used OpenAI LLMs and app.…1d
    Kevin Patrick Murphy@sirbayesObviously everyone should disable "your chats are used for model training", but what if the OAI and Ant engineers told the lawyercats that ICL is not "training", so sharing chat across users via system context is allowed as long as it doesnt get fed to SGD? What does TOS say?1d
    Dr Heidy Khlaaf (هايدي خلاف)@HeidyKhlaafThis along with the recent paper claiming that OAI's formalised Lean proof doesn't correspond to the NL proof of Navier-Stokes, is exactly why we shouldn't take AI labs' claims at face value without scientific consensus and investigations into alleged plagiarism.1d
    Naomi Saphra@nsaphraRT @doomslide: Check out this loser! >uploads a draft to Chat on Sept. 8th >gets scooped by Chat on Oct. 6th "The result released by Open…1d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet